OUR PRACTICE
We are a Young organization founded firmly on the principles of mutual respect, equality, fairness, empowerment, dignity and non-discrimination. We cater to the subjective needs of a situation in alignment with Our core practice areas.
who we are
WE ARE ONE
Our Practice is based on the fundamentals of aiding the underprivileged, marginalized and those with little or remote opportunities for access to administrative and judicial relief. We provide free legal aid consultation for those who need it.
We champion the principles of sustainability, equity and equality as deeply engrained in Our practice ethos and stand firmly with activism in the environmental domain.
The future is inevitable and the future is technology. We suggest the use of technology not as a slave of humanity but as a child. We appreciate this opportunity to lay the foundation for a harmonious partnership between humanity and technology.
Vestralex is everything about progress. We hold dear to Our selves the very concept of advancements in various spheres of business, industry and innovation and strive to help the entreprenures of today and tomorrow start-up and grow-strong.
We acknowledge that the very essence of human growth started with the drive of humanity towards ensuring sustainable food resources. We stand firmly with the development and innovation of the Agricultural sector in India and globally.
Vestralex holds its roots firmly in its grounds and associates with grassroots innovators like a family understanding from Own experience, the desire of these industry leaders of tomorrow to overcome the basic issues faced by the masses that are generally too small for a mammoth enterprise to address.
RECENT POSTS
PRACTICE UPDATES
Self-incriminatory statement recorded by Customs & DRI officers not admissible in trial
Customs Officer and DRI Officers are Police Officers, Self-incriminatory statement recorded by such an officer not admissible in trial.
Life and operation of Anticipatory Bail U/s. 438 Cr. P. C.
Protection granted u/s.438 should not invariably be limited to a fixed period; it should inure in favour of the accused without any restriction on time.
BHARAT ALUMINIUM CO. v. KAISER ALUMINIUM TECHNICAL SERVICE, INC.
[2012) 12 S.C.R. 327
Does Section 2(2) bar the Application of Part I to C Arbitrations which take place outside India?1.1. The omission of the word “only” in Section …
CENTRAL PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, SUPREME COURT OF INDIA v. SUBHASH CHANDRA AGARWAL
WHETHER THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA AND THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA ARE TWO SEPARATE PUBLIC AUTHORITIES? 1. Article 124 of the Constitution, which relates …
Self-Regulating Grievance Mechanism by Publisher at Level II: IT Rules, 2021
This article discusses the Self-Regulating Grievance Mechanism by Publisher at Level II within the purview of Chapter III, Rule 12 of the IT Rules, 2021. …
Self-regulating Grievance Mechanism by Publisher at Level-I: IT Rules, 2021
The IT 2021 Rules include a three-tier grievance redressal structure for dealing with complaints regarding the Code of Ethics. Under Rule 11 of the IT …